The Commercial Excess Squeeze: Structuring Middle-Market Layers
Key Takeaways
- 1Excess tower integrity depends on clean attachment points and no gap risk between layers.
- 2Lead-layer pricing reflects breach frequency, not headline limit.
- 3Effective placement maps each carrier's appetite to the specific layer it assumes.
Structuring middle-market excess liability is an exercise in matching confirmed carrier appetite to precise attachment points. Each proposed layer requires a market willing and authorized to assume severity at that retention level. Available limits must be established for the individual account, not inferred from a headline.
Attachment Point Discipline
The integrity of an excess tower depends on clean attachment:
Lead-Layer Pricing Dynamics
Lead layers carry the highest frequency of breach and therefore command the most rigorous underwriting:
Carrier Risk Appetite Mapping
Not every A-rated carrier writes every layer. Effective placement maps appetite by:
The Takeaway
Coordinating selected excess layers requires human underwriting judgment: review attachment points, lead-layer pricing and continuity of coverage against participating carriers' appetite and authorized terms. StrataCover's Charter 1 target profile is middle-market primary casualty and selected excess or umbrella layers, including programs seeking $10M–$25M total liability limits or participation layers within larger programs. This is not a capacity promise or a liability-limit cap. Charter 1 E&S portal intake is $20,000–$350,000 gross written premium; premium and liability limits are different measures. Actual offers remain subject to carrier underwriting and authority.